<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Men Like Gods</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.talkingsquid.net/archives/136/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.talkingsquid.net/archives/136</link>
	<description>Scientific Romances and Other Curiosities from the Antipodes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 03:33:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lawson</title>
		<link>http://www.talkingsquid.net/archives/136/comment-page-1#comment-2468</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 04:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.talkingsquid.net/archives/136#comment-2468</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it would make more sense if Toye had talked about Bush quoting Kim Stanley Robinson and Blair quoting Iain M. Banks. The closest thing in Churchill&#039;s era that would compare to Star Trek and Dr Who would have been Burroughs and Haggard -- but as we all know, there was only ever one literary science fiction writer, and that was H. G. Wells.

I also find it amusing that people such as G.W. Bush draw on Brave New World without ever understanding that Huxley, if he was still alive, would be one of their most vitriolic critics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it would make more sense if Toye had talked about Bush quoting Kim Stanley Robinson and Blair quoting Iain M. Banks. The closest thing in Churchill&#8217;s era that would compare to Star Trek and Dr Who would have been Burroughs and Haggard &#8212; but as we all know, there was only ever one literary science fiction writer, and that was H. G. Wells.</p>
<p>I also find it amusing that people such as G.W. Bush draw on Brave New World without ever understanding that Huxley, if he was still alive, would be one of their most vitriolic critics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Hood</title>
		<link>http://www.talkingsquid.net/archives/136/comment-page-1#comment-2369</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Hood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 22:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.talkingsquid.net/archives/136#comment-2369</guid>
		<description>Toye lost me when he compared borrowing from Wells to borrowing from Star Trek and Dr Who. Though they may be similar in terms of popular appeal, I&#039;m not sure the same level of sociological intent and philosophhical seriousness is involved, especially as many of the phrases Churchill apparently borrowed from Wells come from his speculative non-fiction rather than from his scientific romances. Still, maybe that&#039;s just a sign of the times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toye lost me when he compared borrowing from Wells to borrowing from Star Trek and Dr Who. Though they may be similar in terms of popular appeal, I&#8217;m not sure the same level of sociological intent and philosophhical seriousness is involved, especially as many of the phrases Churchill apparently borrowed from Wells come from his speculative non-fiction rather than from his scientific romances. Still, maybe that&#8217;s just a sign of the times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

