Archive for January, 2008
Rights of conscience as a contingent variable

Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury, 2008, explains why the current UK blasphemy laws, being relatively toothless, should be replaced by laws to protect religious groups against “thoughtless or cruel” criticism:

The law cannot and should not prohibit argument, which involves criticism, and even, as I noted earlier, angry criticism at times; but it can in some settings send a signal about what is generally proper in a viable society by stigmatising and punishing extreme behaviours that have the effect of silencing argument. Rather than assuming that it is therefore only a few designated kinds of extreme behaviour that are unacceptable and that everything else is fair game, the legal provision should keep before our eyes the general risks of debasing public controversy by thoughtless and (even if unintentionally) cruel styles of speaking and acting.

Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury, 2007, explains why church-run adoption agencies should be allowed to break UK anti-discrimination laws and deny adoptions to gay couples:

…rights of conscience cannot be made subject to legislation, however well-meaning.

Religious education in Australia today

Back when I was going through school, RE was designed to teach about religion. Now it is openly Christian and evangelical. The reason for the change is no doubt complex but I believe it comes down to two major forces: (i) the pandering by political parties to religious leaders, most abjectly by the conservative parties but not exactly rejected on principle by the Labor party either, and (ii) the promise of cheap education by outsourcing RE to volunteers, almost all of whom are by self-selection religious and evangelical. The sad fact remains that the RE that I experienced in a private high-Anglican grammar school thirty years ago was more open-minded and educational than what is being taught in supposedly secular government schools today.

I know all this because I had the dyspeptic pleasure of reading our children’s RE textbooks for this year. They are ostensibly Christian. I have little concern about this. The majority of Australians are nominally Christian. Australian culture, being descended from Western Europe’s, is immersed in Christianity. Even from the purely literary perspective, our arts are soaked in Christian imagery and metaphors. Any RE course of any value will teach the basics of Christian thinking. But what we have is not teaching about Christianity. What we have is open proselytising, and not just of Christianity but of a narrow band of Christianity. In all four Connect textbooks we bought, there is not a single reference to Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Chinese Universalism, or atheism/agnosticism, to name just the beliefs with more than 100 million adherents. There is no indication that other religions exist. Other Christian perspectives appear not to exist either. I don’t expect an in-depth analysis of the Gnostic traditions or the reasons for the Orthodox schism, but it it would be nice to acknowledge that there are other views out there beyond the particularly narrow and conservative high-Anglican tradition embodied in these books. There is no indication that not everyone in the world believes these stories, nor any indication that some people agree with the stories but have different interpretations. This is, to put it plainly, an act of deceit with the aim of securing the conversion of children which takes place with the full sanction — indeed within the official curriculum — of the public education system.

You think I exaggerate? Well, take a look at these:

People need to hear about Jesus

Your children, too, can be evangelists! Just wait ’til they get home tonight.

And how can our children serve Jesus? By doing precisely what conservative Anglican priests in Sydney tell them to do, of course.

Yep. That’s blatant Creationism in our school texts.

Excellent. Tell children their own judgement is worthless, then challenge them to measure their trust in God in a classroom full of other students and with a Christian volunteer overlooking the process. Peer pressure plus authority pressure being applied to nine year old children. How nice.

I wonder who provides this material? Well, it turns out to be…

(more…)

Don’t bend over

Found on eBay…

distressing detail

School for zombies

Just around the corner from us is the Montessori school.

School for Zombies

Wait! I hear the children calling…they want something…

Zombie sign close

I can’t quite make it out…something about grains or trains…need to get closer…

Zombie sign 3

…AAAAAARGH!

An argument for the existence of demons

Karaoke Megastore

Evil walks among us.

Sean Williams nominated for Philip K. Dick Award

It just came down the wire today that Sean Williams’ novel Saturn Returns made the final ballot for the Philip K. Dick Award. The full list includes work by Elizabeth Bear, M. John Harrison, and others. The Dick Award, apart from being the cause of irrepressible jesting, is for the best work of science fiction published in original paperback in the United States and recognises science fiction’s pulp origins. The results will be announced at Norwescon in March.

Parochialism alert: Sean’s nomination means in that over the last few years Australians have won or been nominated for almost all the major international awards in the genre. Not bad for a country that makes up 6-8% of the English-speaking world.

Attack of the juxtaposition fairies #2

Attack of the juxtaposition fairies

Corner of Maud Street and Aerodrome Road, Maroochydore

Astronomy pictures of 2007

Squid favourite Astronomy Pic of the Day has announced its choices for the 12 best astronomical images for the year. Here are my favourites.

Comet McNaught

Lunar eclipse of Saturn's rings

Night sky, Death Valley

Glowing dust among the Pleiades

Iapetus