<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Talking Squid &#187; Cupcake?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.talkingsquid.net/archives/tag/cupcake/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.talkingsquid.net</link>
	<description>Scientific Romances and Other Curiosities from the Antipodes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 05:58:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Avatar: humans are white, aliens are blue</title>
		<link>http://www.talkingsquid.net/archives/1172</link>
		<comments>http://www.talkingsquid.net/archives/1172#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lawson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cupcake?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moving Pictures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sad Fanboys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aliens are blue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humans are white]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.talkingsquid.net/?p=1172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" title="Did James Cameron ever wonder why he needed 24 human characters but only 7 aliens to tell the story?" src="http://www.talkingsquid.net/blogpix/avatars.jpg" alt="" width="441" height="441" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.talkingsquid.net/archives/1172/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cupcake? does Intelligent Design sudoku</title>
		<link>http://www.talkingsquid.net/archives/984</link>
		<comments>http://www.talkingsquid.net/archives/984#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lawson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antinomian Heresies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cupcake?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligent design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sudoku]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.talkingsquid.net/?p=984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Acknowledgement: Google reveals to me that someone else has been here before. I am also thankful for the site in question, Caliibre, for pointing me to this quote from one of Albert Einstein&#8217;s letters: The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" title="Cupcake? does Intelligent Design sudoku" src="http://www.talkingsquid.net/blogpix/Cupcake_ID_sudoku.gif" alt="" width="400" height="456" /></p>
<p>Acknowledgement: Google reveals to me that <a href="http://caliibre.blogspot.com/2006/11/creationists-intelligent-design-and.html">someone else has been here before</a>. I am also thankful for the site in question, <a href="http://caliibre.blogspot.com/">Caliibre</a>, for <a href="http://caliibre.blogspot.com/2008/05/common-sense-from-most-uncommon-man.html">pointing me to this quote from one of Albert Einstein&#8217;s letters</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this.</p></blockquote>
<p>The reason I like this quote is not because it is particularly nuanced or well-argued, but because Einstein is frequently misrepresented as a religious apologist and this statement emphatically puts that to rights. I&#8217;m not entirely sure why the &#8220;(<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">to</span> for me)&#8221; was added (not by Caliibre, I may point out). It seems to me to be an attempt to diminish the strength of Einstein&#8217;s statement so as not to offend delicate religious sentiments&#8230;which is an example of exactly why the quotation is needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.talkingsquid.net/archives/984/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

